50 prvih poljubaca online dating
“Arguments don’t necessarily have to be backed up by professors or written papers.They can come from lived experience.” Translation: it is racist to expect university students to be literate.To counter this trend, Hardy and his allies want to create a “policy only” space in which traditional standards for debate will be enforced.However, this is nearly impossible to do within the two major debate associations, CEDA and the National Debate Tournament (NDT), as they are governed by participants and have few conduct enforcement mechanisms.What with multiculturalism and all, throwing out literacy as a necessary prerequisite of academic success is the only way to remove White privilege.But other teams who have prepared for a traditional policy debate are frustrated when they encounter a meta-debate, or an alternative stylistic approach in competition.Over four hours, the two teams engaged in a heated discussion of concepts like “nigga authenticity” and performed hip-hop and spoken-word poetry in the traditional timed format. His partner Campbell, who won the top speaker award at the National Debate Tournament two weeks later, had been unfairly targeted by the police at the debate venue just days before, and cited this personal trauma as evidence for his case against the government’s treatment of poor African-Americans. In the 2013 championship, two men from Emporia State University, Ryan Walsh and Elijah Smith, employed a similar style and became the first African-Americans to win two national debate tournaments.At one point during Lee’s rebuttal, the clock ran out but he refused to yield the floor. Wait, so it was two black teams arguing about how badly black people are treated when they were supposed to be debating presidential war powers? Many of their arguments, based on personal memoir and rap music, completely ignored the stated resolution, and instead asserted that the framework of collegiate debate has historically privileged straight, white, middle-class students. Debate tournaments now exist exclusively for the purpose of soothing the feelings of blacks, the original purpose having been thrown out completely.
I see no way that this rule of “black people can win by sayig things are unfair to them” cannot apply to all fields of academia. Who else but a racist would think black people should not be given awards simply for crying that people are mean to them, or that they think maybe people are being mean to them.
In order to accommodate low-IQ minorities, the academic sphere is throwing out any and all standards of procedure, making it possible for illiterates to succeed.
The Atlantic spells this out for you in no uncertain terms, simply adding the spin of “oh no, don’t worry, this is good.” Here is one of the debates with these blacks.
Strangely, there has been no attempt to make basketball more accessible to White people.
The latest sickening example of the collapse of the Western educational establishment in the face of overwhelming “diversification” is in the realm of the traditional debate tournament.
These skills—together with a non-confrontational presentation style—are considered crucial for success in fields like law and business.